Depth filtration is an effective method for removing particles from liquids and gases, particularly when the contaminant load is high. Unlike surface or membrane filters, which trap particles on the surface, depth filters capture contaminants throughout the thickness of the media. This allows for higher dirt-holding capacity and more prolonged use. In this blog, we’ll explore the various types of depth filters available, along with their advantages and disadvantages.
Understanding Depth Filters: Types, Advantages, and Disadvantages
Wound Depth Filters
Wound filters, sometimes known as string wound consist of a continuous strand of fibre (often polypropylene, cotton, or glass) wrapped around a central core (either polypropylene or stainless steel). The winding creates layers with different densities, enabling the capture of both large and small particles as fluids pass through.
Advantages:
High Dirt-Holding Capacity: The gradient structure captures a range of particle sizes.
Cost-Effective: Wound filters have the lowest cost per depth filter cartridge.
Versatile Materials: They can be made from various fibres to match different chemical compatibilities.
Disadvantages:
Low Filtration Consistency: Pore size can vary due to manual winding, affecting filtration precision and retention.
Limited Fine Filtration: Best suited for larger particles (20 micron and above).
Susceptible to Collapse: The structure may deform under high pressure, allowing channelling and further reducing precision and retention.
Melt-Blown Depth Filters (also known as Spun Depth Filters)
Melt-blown filters are made by extruding fine thermoplastic fibres (commonly polypropylene, but nylon and polyester used to increase the continuous temperature of operation and chemical compatibility) that create a non-woven rigid matrix. This random structure is designed to taper and provide depth filtration by trapping different sized particles throughout the whole depth media.
Advantages:
Fine Particle Retention: Effective at removing fine particles less than 1 micron as well as particles above 1 micron to 50 micron.
Cost effective: Melt blown depth filters are one of the lowest unit cost filters.
Gels and agglomerations: Due to the thickness of the depth filter, they are very effective at removing soft or deformable particles.
Good Chemical Compatibility: Polypropylene withstands a wide range of chemicals, while nylon and polyester allow extension of both temperature and pressure range of operation.
Disadvantages:
Lower Dirt-Holding Capacity: These filters tend to clog faster than higher surface area pleated depth filters.
Resin-Bonded Depth Filters
Resin-bonded filters are made by bonding natural or synthetic fibres (such as cellulose or polyester) with a resin. The curing process creates a strong and rigid structure that holds up under demanding conditions.
Advantages:
High Strength: They resist deformation under high pressure and keep performance. Excellent for use in high viscosity liquid or mastic applications.
Temperature and Chemical Resistance: Suitable for high-temperature processes and aggressive chemicals.
Good Dirt-Holding Capacity: They can retain significant contaminants without performance degradation.
Disadvantages:
Higher Cost: They tend to be more expensive compared to wound or melt-blown filters.
Environmentally Unfriendly: Due to their manufacturing process
Pleated Depth Filters
Pleated filters combine depth filtration with an increased surface area by pleating the filter depth media. This design enhances the filter’s dirt-holding capacity while maintaining good particle retention.
Advantages:
Low Pressure Drop: They maintain a low pressure drop, which leads to far longer service life than melt blown alternatives.
Increased Dirt-Holding Capacity: Pleating increases the surface area, allowing for more contaminants to be captured of a specific size.
Fine Filtration: Available for filtration down to 0.1 microns.
Glass Fibre media: Significantly decreases pressure drop increasing service life substantially. Depth media fibres also significantly increase the particle loading that can be achieved prior to blockage.
Disadvantages:
- Costlier: The complex construction process makes them initially more expensive than melt blown, but they have a far cheaper life cost on continuous operating (24 x 7) systems.
Sheet Filters
Sheet filters are flat filter media, typically made of cellulose or other fibrous materials, often combined with adsorptive materials like activated carbon or diatomaceous earth. These filters are widely used in industries like wine, beer, pharmaceuticals, and chemicals. They offer high dirt-holding capacity and are available in various grades for different levels of filtration.
Advantages:
- High Dirt-Holding Capacity: Due to their thick structure, sheet filters can retain large quantities of contaminants.
- Versatile Filtration: Available in a wide range of filtration grades, from coarse to sterile filtration.
- Can Be Customised: Sheet filters can be tailored to include absorbent materials like activated carbon for adsorption of dissolved substances.
Disadvantages:
- Limited Flow Rates: Flow rates can be restricted, particularly in thicker sheets with finer filtration ratings.
- Labour-Intensive: Changing and handling large sheets can be cumbersome, especially in larger-scale operations.
- Single-Use: Once clogged, sheet filters typically cannot be reused.
Lenticular Filters
Lenticular filters are essentially sheet filters in a modular, stacked design. The sheets are layered in a circular or lenticular configuration, creating a compact depth filter with high dirt-holding capacity. This design is used in applications where frequent change-outs are needed, such as in the food and beverage industry or in biopharmaceutical production.
Advantages:
- Compact and Modular Design: Lenticular filters save space and are easy to install or replace.
- Higher Dirt-Holding Capacity: The stacked sheet configuration provides extended filtration life.
- Versatile Applications: Like sheet filters, lenticular filters are available in multiple grades, from pre-filtration to sterile filtration.
- Reusable Options: Some designs allow for some backwashing or cleaning, extending the filter's service life.
Disadvantages:
- Cost: Lenticular filters are more expensive than flat sheet filters.
- Flow Limitation: Flow rates may still be limited, especially with finer grades of filtration, due to pressure requirements.
Depth filters provide a versatile solution for a wide range of filtration needs. Whether you are dealing with heavy contaminant loads, aggressive chemicals, or high-precision applications, there is a depth filter type designed to meet the challenge. Here’s a quick comparison:
- Wound Filters: Affordable and versatile but less precise and prone to collapse under pressure.
- Melt-Blown Filters: Great for fine filtration and low initial cost make it ideal for batch type applications.
- Resin-Bonded Filters: Strong and resilient in demanding pressure and temperature conditions but not ideal for fine filtration.
- Pleated Filters: Combine high dirt capacity with fine filtration, though more expensive per filter, far superior for continuous operation.
- Sheet Filters: Simple, high dirt-holding capacity and cheap, but can be cumbersome to handle and replace. Bulky to store compared to other depth filters.
- Lenticular Filters: Compact, modular, and versatile, offering long service life but with higher upfront costs.
Choosing the right depth filter involves balancing factors such as filtration efficiency, dirt-holding capacity, chemical compatibility, and cost. Each type offers unique advantages, making them suitable for specific industries and applications.
Here at Porefiltration, we live and breathe filters. So If you'd like a no-obligation quote, where we guarantee to save you to 15% off you current filtration spend, or you'd just like some advice on your filtration processes, then give us a call or send us an email and we'd be happy to help.
PoreFiltration – Making your filtration systems work harder
