When selecting a microfiltration membrane for critical applications, one of the key considerations is whether to use an asymmetrical or symmetrical membrane structure.
Using Asymmetrical Membrane Filters rather than Symmetrical Membrane Filters
Both types of membranes serve essential functions in industries such as pharmaceuticals, food and beverage, water treatment, and microelectronics. However, asymmetrical membrane filters offer significant benefits over their symmetrical counterparts, making them the preferred choice due to their far lower annual running costs for many applications.
Understanding Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Membranes
Symmetrical Membrane Structure 
Symmetrical membranes have a uniform pore structure throughout their thickness. This consistency provides predictable filtration performance but can lead to limitations in flow rate and dirt-holding capacity. Because the pores are the same size across the entire membrane thickness, contaminants are retained evenly throughout, which may cause premature clogging and higher pressure drops. Nylon, PTFE and PVDF are materials that produce symmetrical membranes.
Asymmetrical Membrane Structure
Asymmetrical membranes have a gradient pore structure, with larger pores on the upstream side and smaller pores on the downstream side. This design allows for more efficient particle retention while maintaining a higher flow rate. The gradual reduction in pore size provides a depth filtration effect, allowing for higher dirt-holding capacity and extended filter life.
Benefits of Asymmetrical Membranes
-
Higher Flow Rates
The gradient pore structure of asymmetrical membranes reduces resistance to fluid flow, enabling higher flow rates at lower differential pressures. This makes them particularly useful in applications requiring high-throughput filtration, such as pharmaceutical-grade water and beverage processing. On new applications initial capital costs are reduced by a third to a half, as flowrates at the initial clean differential pressure are between 50 to 100% greater. -
Greater Dirt-Holding Capacity
Due to their depth filtration effect, asymmetrical membranes can capture more contaminants before clogging compared to symmetrical membranes. This extends filter life and reduces the frequency of filter replacements, lowering operational costs.
Asymmetrical membranes allow for the gradual retention of particles, preventing rapid clogging of the membrane surface. This leads to a more uniform distribution of contaminants and prolongs the membrane’s usability, making them highly efficient in applications involving high particulate loads.
- Lower Operating Costs
The extended lifespan and improved throughput of asymmetrical membranes contribute to lower overall filtration costs. With fewer filter changes and reduced downtime, operational efficiency is significantly improved. In existing applications membrane filter costs can be reduced by up to 50% if symmetrical membrane filters are replaced with asymmetrical membrane filters. -
Improved Performance in Sterile Filtration
In pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical applications, asymmetrical membranes are particularly beneficial for sterilising-grade filtration. Their structure enhances microbial retention while maintaining efficient flow, making them ideal for critical sterile applications.
Membrane Types Available in both Asymmetrical and Symmetrical Configurations
Not all membrane materials can be manufactured in an asymmetrical structure, but several common types are available:
- Polyethersulfone (PES) – Used in pharmaceutical, food and beverage, and medical applications due to its excellent flow characteristics and biocompatibility.
- Polysulfone (PSU) – Utilised in high-temperature and aggressive chemical applications.
- Cellulose Acetate (CA) – Preferred in biological and protein-sensitive applications where low protein binding is necessary.
When to Use Symmetrical Membranes
Despite the many advantages of asymmetrical membranes, symmetrical membranes still have their place in filtration. They are ideal when absolute precision in pore size distribution is needed, such as in analytical sample preparation or batch filtration where service life and flowrates are not an issue.
Asymmetrical membrane filters offer significant operating cost advantages over symmetrical membranes due to their flow rate, dirt-holding capacity, and filter longevity performance. Their unique structure makes them the preferred choice for many demanding applications, particularly in continuous liquid filtration where high efficiency and extended service life are crucial. When selecting a membrane for your filtration system, understanding these differences can help ensure best performance, cost savings, and improved operational efficiency.
Take a look at PoreFiltration’s SurePore PES membrane filter range to see how you might reduce your running costs. Or you can just give us a call or send us an email - we're here to help you make the best choice for your filtration needs.
And if you'd like to read more about how to save money on your filtration systems, then read our blogs: 5 Tips to Help Minimise Annual Expenditure on Filtration and Save 40% on Filtration Costs Through efficiency Savings.
PoreFiltration – Making your filtration systems work harder
